8/14/2023 0 Comments Sononym of componentsIt seems that some domains are more mature regarding their conceptualization and theorizing on engagement than others. The results showed that engagement is used in seven functional domains, categorized as follows: student ( n = 18), customer ( n = 12), health ( n = 11), society ( n = 10), work ( n = 9), digital ( n = 8), and transdisciplinary ( n = 1) domains. This led to 69 articles being included for further analyses. All titles, abstracts, and full texts were screened based on specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. A search of five bibliographic databases yielded 1,231 unique records. A comprehensive systematic scoping review of the existing literature was conducted in order to identify the domains in which engagement is used, to extract the associated definitions of engagement, and to identify the dimensionality or components thereof. As such, the aim of this paper was 3-fold: (a) to investigate in which domains engagement features, (b) to determine what constitutes engagement in these different domains, and (c) to determine whether there are any common components that seem to be important. Given the cross-disciplinary use of the term “engagement,” investigating how engagement (and its components) is conceptualized in different domains could lead to determining common components that are deemed important for eHealth technological design. A clearer understanding of engagement could provide a valuable starting point for guidelines relating to the design and development of eHealth technologies. Within the context of eHealth interventions, a shared understanding of what constitutes engagement in and with eHealth technologies is missing. 6Department of Design, Production and Management, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands. ![]() ![]() 5Institut für Psychologie, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.4Department of Human Resource Management, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.3Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Eindhoven, Eindhoven, Netherlands.2Optentia Research Focus Area, North-West University, Vanderbijlpark, South Africa.1Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, Centre for eHealth and Wellbeing Research, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.Kelders 1,2 *, Llewellyn Ellardus van Zyl 2,3,4,5 and Geke D. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.Saskia M. You are receiving this because you are on a team that was mentioned. ![]() Subject: Re: Re-name Master Components to a more inclusive synonym ( #6525)Īm I the only one finding this ridiculous? PS: The fact that this issue is raised and discussed purely by white caucasian men should make you think a little. Sorry for this small rant, but I've seen far to many projects wasting time on this non issue in the past, creating long/eternal threads just to settle a damn nomenclature issue which no one was offended in the first place. ![]() The fact that someone believed it in the past, doesn't make it real, and it's not changing the present that you erase the mistakes of the past.Ĭalling *ware components master/slave has never made anyone racist. This term is NOT related whatsoever from the "master race" concept or the "slave trade", as pointed out by others the master/slave nomenclature has been used in IT for decades to indicate that a specific part of a system id dependant on another part, if you see in any way a connection on the white masters and $skin-color slaves, I have a bad news for you: you are the racist, because you imply that this master/slave concept applies to humans. My speculation is that the % of "offended" people would be less than 1%. I'd really really go an poll the majority of people working in CS/IT asking if ANYONE has EVER felt discriminated by the naming master/slave. Please don't waste the time fo N+1 people into a non real issue.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |